LVMH stock | |
Logo | |
Country | France |
Industry | Luxury goods |
Isin | FR0000121014 |
Market cap. | 246,2 billion $ |
Dividend yield | 1.7% |
Dividend stability | 0.94 of max. 1.0 |
Earnings stability | 0.93 of max. 1.0 |
The LVMH stock has given much pleasure to long-term investors. The stocks of the one and only luxury goods company active in all the main markets of the luxury segment have achieved an average annual return of over 20 percent since 2009. Not even the COVID-19 shock could permanently harm the positive momentum. Even though the stock lost almost 30 percent in value parallel with the market, it is now back just below its all-time high of EUR 440.
In this analysis, we check if the stock is a buy or whether it seems more like a luxury object for enthusiasts. We also look at the Tiffany takeover that is threatened by failure and whether failure would be more of a setback or even a better scenario for shareholders.
LVMH (Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton) is the largest luxury goods company in the world and was created in 1987 with the merger of Louis Vuitton and Moët Hennessy. The individual companies themselves already had a long history. For instance, the foundation of the champagne manufacturer Moët et Chandondes dates back to 1743. Today, LVMH is divided into six segments containing over 70 brands. These brands or houses, as the company calls them, operate largely independently, which gives them a high degree of flexibility. At the same time, however, they benefit from the parent company’s market research, distribution channels, and logistics networks.
LVMH generates 8 percent of its revenue with the sale of jewelry and watches. LVMH has six brands in its portfolio, three from the watch segment, and three from the jewelry segment. The watch segment includes the brands Chaumet, TAG Heuer, and Zenith, while in the jewelry segment LVMH owns the brands Bulgari, Fred, and Hublot. In 2019 these six brands generated EUR 4.3 billion in revenue.
In the wine and spirits segment, LVMH holds 23 brands which contributed 10 percent of total sales in 2019 (EUR 5.5 billion). This segment includes luxury brands in wine, champagne, cognac, rum, vodka, and whiskey. Moët & Chandon, Dom Pérignon, Veuve Clicquot, Ardberg, and Hennessy are the most iconic brands. The oldest winery in LVMH’s portfolio, Clos des Lambrays, was founded in 1365. It is impressive that these brands are several hundred years old. The oldest winery in LVMH’s portfolio, Clos des Lambrays, was founded in 1365.
LVMH earns a further 13 percent of its revenue from perfume and cosmetics. 14 brands contributed nearly EUR 7 billion in 2019, with cosmetics accounting for the lion’s share of 75 percent. Brands in this segment include Guerlain, Christian Dior and Givenchy, among others.
LVMH generates most of its revenue in the iconic fashion and leather goods segment. In 2019, 17 brands such as Louis Vuitton, Rimowa, and Loewe generated EUR 22.2 billion or 41 percent of total sales.
In the “Selective Retailing” segment, LVMH distributes its products in a total of 2011 stores. These include duty-free stores or the boutiques of the LVMH subsidiary Starboard Cruise Services. With Starboard Cruise Services, LVMH meets the appetite of cruise ship passengers, which is currently out of fashion due to the corona pandemic. In an exclusive environment, passengers contributed EUR 14.7 billion to the segment’s total revenues in 2019 with their purchases.
LVMH is active in other markets through its small “Other Activities” segment. These include yachts (Royal Van Lent), media (Les Echos, Le Parisien), and hotels (Cheval Blanc Courchevel).
All LVMH products have a touch of exclusivity. This exclusivity and the prestige that comes with it turn ordinary and functional products like a bag into a status symbol. LVMH does not build up these brands itself but buys them. Thus, in 2011 it acquired Bulgari. In 2016, LVMH bought an 80% stake in the luxury suitcase manufacturer Rimowa and in 2017, LVMH acquired the fashion division of Dior. All these purchases save LVMH from having to build up a new brand from scratch. Instead, it “merely” has to maintain the brands it has purchased, some of which have a centuries-old prestige. To do this, LVMH resorts to the usual tricks of the trade: artificial scarcity and marketing, which probably sounds more comfortable than it is. After all, copy-cats and the so-called grey market threaten the prestige character of luxury goods and, in extreme cases, even force companies like LVMH to destroy their products or buy back goods from unlicensed dealers. Jean-Claude-Biver, head of LVMH’s Watch Division, summarizes the extent of the threat:
In luxury goods, when you break the illusion of prestige, the dream, the prices, it takes away the confidence. It means slow death for luxury goods.
This threat is, however, rather a problem affecting the entire luxury industry. In particular, LVMH has shown that it can maintain its products’ prestige and shortage of supply. This is ensured by CEO Bernard Arnauld, who is LVMH’s largest shareholder with 47 percent and one of the five wealthiest people on earth. I like when owners or even founding families run a company. That is no guarantee of success, but it is a good thing. However, as described in our previous Henkel analysis, there is a connection between family ownership and far-sighted management, where thinking is not in quarters but decades or generations.
For decades, LVMH has benefited from a growing and luxury-seeking middle and upper class. The growth of the Asian markets, especially the Chinese market, and the already mentioned strategy of buying established brands contribute to this. Accordingly, sales have developed well over the last 30 years. From just EUR 3 billion in 1990 to EUR 53.7 billion in 2019, LVMH is also benefiting from its global footprint. In 2019, LVMH generated 37 percent of its revenues in Asia, followed by Europe (28 percent) and the USA (24 percent). This diversification ensures that currency fluctuations are smoothed out especially against the background of the currently weak US dollar and the strong euro.
However, the revenue performance, as shown at DividendStocks.Cash also shows that luxury goods are cyclical in nature and, therefore, only enjoy a boom in times of economic prosperity. Thus, revenue declined both in 2009 and during the Corona crisis. The decline in revenue this year was artificially exacerbated by the state-imposed store closures. Sales in the first six months of 2020 fell by a substantial 27 percent. According to the forecasts, however, next year, it is expected to exceed the previous year’s level again and continue to grow.
LVMH operates profitably and has not recorded one single year of losses in the past 30 years. From EUR 1.45 in 2000, LVMH increased earnings per share to EUR 14.23 last year. Cash flow from operating activities has also grown enormously, from EUR 1.18 per share in 2000 to EUR 23.13 per share in 2019. However, the cyclical nature of the business is also reflected in profitability. As a result of the corona crisis, profits collapsed by almost 70 percent in the first six months of 2020.
Accordingly, margins will decline in 2020, although their stability in recent years suggests that the overall profitability is assured. Nevertheless, the operating margin and net margin are relatively low, mainly due to high marketing expenses.
However, Hermes shows that better margins are achievable in the luxury goods sector. With a lower gross margin of 60 percent, competitor Hermes has a much higher operating margin of 29 percent and a net margin of 18 percent, which is twice as high.
The LVMH stock was long considered a growth jewel for dividend chasers searching for a predictable passive income. Although the company only kept dividend payments stable at EUR 1.6 per share during the financial crisis of 2009, dividend fans have nevertheless come at their expense over the past decades. While LVMH increased its dividend from EUR 0.68 in 2000 to EUR 7.2 in 2019 with semiannual distributions, a bitter pill followed with the coronavirus. Against the backdrop of uncertain developments and the massive slump in profits, the management cut the dividend by a third to EUR 4.8. The dividend yield has thus fallen to an even lower level of 1.1 percent. Even if we assume that payments will reach the old level by 2022 at the latest, the dividend yield would still be a meager 1.5% based on the current share price.
With a regular payout ratio of between 30 and 50 percent of profits and 40 and 55 percent of free cash flow before the coronavirus outbreak, the dividend was always within a safe range. However, extreme events, such as the corona crisis show that shareholders are never immune to unpleasant surprises.
What the price increases and the low dividend yield already indicate is confirmed by a look at the Dynamic Fair-Value calculator: The LVMH stock is historically overvalued. The adjusted P/E ratio of 24, based on the 2019 earnings not affected by the coronavirus, also indicates a significant overvaluation. Based on the historical P/E ratio and price-to-cash flow ratio and considering last year’s profits and operating cash flow, the resulting fair-value indicates an overvaluation by more than 10 percent. Thus, even if we assume a rapid recovery of the business, the LVMH stock would remain overvalued for the next three years.
With the acquisition of Tiffany announced at the end of 2019 for USD 16.2 billion, LVMH wanted to strengthen its position in the jewelry sector and further expand its presence in the US. Allegedly, the French government asked LVMH to postpone the merger due to customs disputes with the US. From a fundamental point of view, a failure of the takeover should be bearable for shareholders. Although the prestige character fits well into LVMH’s portfolio, in the end, it would have been just the purchase of another brand. Even before the coronavirus emerged, the price for the 180-year-old jewelry company was too expensive in my view. The corona crisis has further intensified the overvaluation.
Therefore, Tiffany is excessively expensive and would also only contribute little to an improvement in profitability. With a gross margin of 62.4 percent, an operating margin of 16.5 percent, and a net margin of 12.2 percent in 2019, it is somewhat on par with LVMH. Another advantage of the failure of the acquisition is that LVMH could lighten its balance sheet somewhat. The debt ratio is relatively high after rising from 53 percent to 63 percent in 2019. The ability to repay the debt, which is primarily based on cash flow, could decline significantly again depending on the further course of the corona crisis, so it is farsighted to keep the reins somewhat tighter.
With the LVMH stock, you get the global luxury boom into your portfolio. The company is excellently positioned and should continue to profit from growth in essential markets in the long term. Unfortunately, the stock is historically overvalued. The overvaluation even remains if we exclude the slump in the operating business caused by the coronavirus. For dividend hunters, the stock also has its dark sides. Not only is the dividend yield historically low, but the recent dividend cut has shown that LVMH remains a cyclical stock. Because of the high current stock price, the stock is not a buy for me, but rather a case for a long-term stock savings plan. Other quality stocks, some of which are more favorably valued, can be found at DividendStocks.Cash.
Cookie | Type | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|---|
__cfduid | 1 | 11 months | The cookie is set by CloudFare. The cookie is used to identify individual clients behind a shared IP address d apply security settings on a per-client basis. It doesnot correspond to any user ID in the web application and does not store any personally identifiable information. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 0 | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The purpose of this cookie is to check whether or not the user has given the consent to the usage of cookies under the category 'Analytics'. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 0 | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The purpose of this cookie is to check whether or not the user has given the consent to the usage of cookies under the category 'Necessary'. |
viewed_cookie_policy | 0 | 1 hour | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Cookie | Type | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|---|
_ga | 0 | 2 years | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, camapign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assigns a randoly generated number to identify unique visitors. |
_gat_gtag_UA_90022463_5 | 0 | 1 minute | Google uses this cookie to distinguish users. |
_gid | 0 | 1 day | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form. |