The Facebook stock is closely linked to the company’s founder, Mark Zuckerberg. Someone who teaches himself coding as an adolescent, who is a billionaire at 23, who is one of the five wealthiest people in the world in his mid-thirties, and who has been awarded an honorary doctorate from Harvard University despite leaving university without a degree, has done many things right. Facebook’s shareholders also have reason to be happy. Since the IPO in May 2012, the Facebook stock has risen by 530 percent and recently reached a new high. However, the CEO of Facebook does not intend to retire yet. Instead, we can assume that the self-made billionaire will continue to hold the reins of Facebook in his hands.
Facebook stock | |
Logo | |
Country | USA |
Industry | Internet |
Isin | US30303M1027 |
Market cap. | 667,1 billion $ |
Dividend yield | – |
Dividend stability | – |
Earnings stability | 0,89 of max. 1.0 |
Did the Facebook stock run hot after the price rise, or is it still a buy? Is there more behind the persistent rumor that Facebook is one of the few tech stocks that are still undervalued? We shed light into this questions in this stock analysis.
If you’re considering buying Facebook stocks and looking at the fundamental figures, you may notice the somewhat strange name “Facebook Inc-A”. The reason for this is quickly explained. Like Berkshire Hathaway or Google´s parent alphabet, Facebook stocks are split into different classes (A, B and C). The difference between the separate classes has to do with differing voting rights. Like other companies, Facebook uses different classes of stocks to limit the voting power of its shareholders.
Besides, Mark Zuckerberg allegedly wants to sell and donate 99 percent of his shares, but still wants to keep control of his baby as long as possible. As a result, Facebook’s A-shares carry only a single voting right, while the B-shares carry tenfold voting rights and are mainly held by employees, for example, co-founders Eduardo Saverin, Dustin Moskovitz, and Christopher Hughes. However, a few years later, non-voting C-shares were added, which diluted the value of the existing stocks accordingly. C-Shares make it easier for Mark Zuckerberg to keep his promise and donate C-Class shares to Facebook without losing voting rights.
Facebook started its success story with the social network, on which friends, colleagues and like-minded people can connect and exchange information. However, Mark Zuckerberg is steadily expanding his company’s portfolio by buying up companies, including competitors.
In 2012, Facebook acquired Instagram for almost one billion USD. In 2014, Zuckerberg also bought the growing messenger competitor WhatsApp for an extraordinary $19 billion. At that time, the amount was incredible because WhatsApp had revenues of nearly $1 million, which consisted of the purchase price for the app download and an annual fee in some countries. This meager income source dried up completely when Facebook made the app available to users completely free of charge.
Why has Facebook put nearly $20 billion on the table for WhatsApp? One aspect was undoubtedly the growing importance of WhatsApp as a messenger, which Facebook could not match with its in-house messenger. But just as valuable was the data treasure that WhatsApp holds for Facebook. Although communication on WhatsApp is encrypted, Facebook gained access to contact lists, name, birthday, status, profile pictures, and other data that users voluntarily shared. The additional users and their data are fueling Facebook’s growth engine. Therefore, we will take a closer look under the hood of this engine, how it works, and why it was worth paying $19 billion “just” for data.
The business model of Facebook is advertising. Facebook makes its platforms available to users free of charge, but not out of pure charity. It is not the platform that is the product, but the users for whom other companies pay to place targeted advertisements on the platform to market their products. Although Facebook has repeatedly tried to diversify its business, advertising revenue remains the most important source of income. The weight of the other revenue sources is negligible and was less than $300 million last quarter. Compared to total revenues of $17 billion in the first quarter of 2020, this is just 1.6 percent.
Conversely, Facebook cannot be blamed for monetizing its active users as its most valuable assets to the limit. And the number of daily active users is still growing in all parts of the world. Even the long-serving core product Facebook has still not reached it peak but continues to record growing user numbers every quarter. However, the speed of growth has been declining for years. Due to the corona pandemic, the number of users increased in the first quarter of this year, but this special effect will fizzle out as the initial restrictions are eased worldwide. The moving average in the form of the red dotted line shows the long-term declining growth of daily users.
While the number of daily users above only includes the use of the Facebook platform, the following figures show cross-platform growth including WhatsApp and Instagram. In the first quarter of 2020, nearly 3 billion people use Facebook services at least once a month. A truly impressive number.
Currently, about 4.5 billion people in the world have access to the Internet. Two-thirds of them use one of Facebook´s platforms at least once a month and provide the company with valuable data and information through their use. Facebook can, in turn, use this data to place targeted advertisements for other companies’ products and services. Such personalized advertising is very valuable for companies because it promises a higher conversion rate (=successful conversion of potential customers to actual buyers) than conventional forms of advertising with immense wastage.
Facebook also benefits from so-called negative network effects, which we already discussed in our Amazon stock analysis. If all users use Facebook services, hardly anyone will bother with another messenger that only a fraction of their friends and acquaintances use. Facebook benefits from this moat. Likewise, with every new service, new users are added, who, in turn, provide Facebook with more data, which increases the advertising value of the Facebook platforms, so that even more money is spent on targeted advertising.
Like Alphabet, Facebook has been trying to put its revenues on a broader basis to make it less dependent on the advertising business. To get closer to its goal, Facebook has acquired companies here and there or bought shares in other companies. Particularly early examples are the takeover of the virtual reality hardware manufacturer Oculus VR in 2014 and the game developer Beat Games, also active in the field of virtual reality, last year. The so-called Virtual Reality creates a virtual environment using computer technology, into which users can immerse themselves, for example, through glasses or a mask.
Facebook has already made two more purchases in the current year 2020. Facebook acquired a 10 percent stake in Jio Platforms, a subsidiary of the Indian Reliance Industries. In addition to India’s largest telecommunications company with almost 400 million users, it hosts several other apps, such as the Jio Money app, which offers digital payment options. In addition to Facebook, Intel, Google, the private equity firm KKK, as well as Qualcomm and the Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund have invested in Jio Platforms. Facebook hopes that this investment will give it a better foothold in the Indian market and provide insights into user data and usage behavior.
Besides, Facebook acquired the GIF database “Giphy” in spring 2020 to integrate it into its platforms. A GIF (“Graphics Interchange Format”) is a small short video that hardly takes up any storage space, usually transports a specific message, and allows users to express themselves in chats.
I think that Facebook will find other ways to monetize its data treasure in the future. The management is very experimental. The possibilities of using Facebook as a sales platform are particularly exciting. With Facebook Marketplace, a first possibility has been created to allow private users and smaller businesses to sell mainly local products. Furthermore, Facebook and Instagram Shops were introduced in May 2020, enabling sellers to post their online shops directly on Facebook platforms. You can imagine that Facebook provides shop windows on its services where companies can post and even sell their products. The redirection to the company’s website, which must also have implemented an online shopping system, is now a thing of the past.
The internet currency Libra, which was co-designed by Facebook, shows Mark Zuckerberg’s desire to expand the company. Facebook wants to offer a wallet application, a kind of digital wallet, through its subsidiary Novi (former Calibra), which will allow users of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram to make online purchases conveniently. WhatsApp Pay, which is attempting to launch in Brazil with considerable regulatory problems, is also aiming in this direction.
I suspect that Facebook is increasingly developing its ecosystem in the direction of a digital “mall” or digital “shopping center” where people meet for social reasons and, at the same time, buy products alone or together. The advantages over Amazon and the Amazon Marketplace are apparent. At Amazon, customers have to navigate to Amazon; at Facebook, customers are already there in the form of active users and only need to be picked up by the company present there. And who picks up the customers? Facebook, of course, using personalized advertising.
Facebook is one of the tech companies that became profitable relatively quickly and has continuously increased revenues and profits. While the revenue in 2009 was only $777 million, the turnover in 2020 will probably be $77 billion. Facebook has thus increased its revenues a hundredfold in just under 11 years. Although the current corona pandemic is driving increased Facebook platforms’ usage, revenues are declining as many companies have seen their advertising budgets shrink in the wake of the crisis.
Profitability has fallen significantly in recent years. Data scandals such as Cambridge Analytica or abuse of the Facebook platforms to agitate or spread alleged “fake news” cost Facebook a lot of money. To avoid further scandals, Facebook is investing massively in data security, data transparency, and data control and new employees, at the expense of operating margins. These fell from just under 50 percent to a predicted 33 percent for the current fiscal year.
The declining margins explain why earnings are only moving sideways despite rising revenues since 2019. Improvement is only in sight for the financial year 2021, and only then should earnings pick up again with even more substantial growth in revenues. It is nevertheless impressive how quickly Mark Zuckerberg succeeded in making the company profitable. In 2015, cash flow and earnings exploded before stagnation sets in due to falling margins. Once margins have settled at the lower level, further sales growth will bear fruit again, and profits and cash flows should rise again.
As you can see in the dynamic valuation below, the Facebook stock seems slightly overvalued based on the historical cash flow and reported earnings of the last four quarters. This overvaluation increases when we look at the forecasts for the current fiscal year, which assumes a decreasing cash flow with stagnating earnings. The situation is not expected to improve until the next financial year, in which case the stock would be roughly fairly valued at today’s price level, only to be undervalued in the fiscal year after that finally.
I have used the period from the fiscal year 2017 to calculate the valuation multiples (P/E ratio etc.) because Facebook was previously valued significantly higher. At that time, margins were still rising and peaked at just under 50 percent, before margins and multiples such as the P/E ratio went south.
A definite plus point for Facebook, however, is its solid balance sheet. Facebook has a debt ratio of just 24 percent. The company sits on a cash mountain of over $60 billion that reaches into the clouds. In one fell swoop, it could pay off all its debts, including liabilities, and it would still have $30 billion in its hands to use it for investments, acquisitions, share buybacks, or even dividend payments. I think Facebook could easily manage a second lockdown in the wake of the COVID 19 pandemic, even if companies cut their advertising budgets due to economic difficulties.
That a growth company from the group of FAANG stocks (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google) with such a solid balance sheet is not excessively overvalued seems unusual in the current market phase. The above mentioned lower margins are a significant reason for the comparatively low valuation of Facebook. Two other reasons for the moderate valuation are the potential risks that you are taking with the Facebook stock in your portfolio.
Facebook is still struggling with its strong dependence on advertising. The advertising business is vulnerable from two sides. On the one hand, the popularity of Facebook services could decline, and users could migrate. On the other hand, companies could reduce their advertising spending for economic, social, or political reasons or boycott Facebook as an advertising platform altogether.
As with Amazon, another threat lies in the market power of Facebook. Competition authorities around the world are looking at Facebook with a critical eye, competitors and politics are demanding, for example, that WhatsApp should be spun off from Facebook. However, such spin-offs, or unbundling, are very rare. However, the German Federal Cartel Office has already prohibited Facebook from combining user data from different platforms. As a consequence, this decision leads to an internal unbundling of the company. Although the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court overturned the decision, the Federal Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of the Federal Cartel Office. Accordingly, I would not ignore such developments in the valuation of the Facebook stock.
With the Facebook stock, you get a tech company with enormous market power and still high growth potential in your portfolio. But be careful: the stock is not as cheap as it seems at first glance. The market rightly values Facebook at a discount since 2017. Declining margins and Facebook’s dependence on advertising revenues are the main reasons for this. Political discussions and antitrust demands for unbundling are also weighing on the stock price.
Conversely, however, the advertising business is still going strong and opens up new revenue channels for Facebook with initiatives like Facebook and Instagram Shops. Besides, Facebook has a bursting pocket full of money, so that it can simply aquire growing competitors if necessary. It remains to be seen whether Facebook will get the margin improved and generate new revenues with advertising alongside the bread-and-butter business. And if so, today would be a similar opportunity for entry as it was with Microsoft when Steve Ballmer was in charge.
Cookie | Type | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|---|
__cfduid | 1 | 11 months | The cookie is set by CloudFare. The cookie is used to identify individual clients behind a shared IP address d apply security settings on a per-client basis. It doesnot correspond to any user ID in the web application and does not store any personally identifiable information. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 0 | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The purpose of this cookie is to check whether or not the user has given the consent to the usage of cookies under the category 'Analytics'. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 0 | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The purpose of this cookie is to check whether or not the user has given the consent to the usage of cookies under the category 'Necessary'. |
viewed_cookie_policy | 0 | 1 hour | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Cookie | Type | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|---|
_ga | 0 | 2 years | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, camapign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assigns a randoly generated number to identify unique visitors. |
_gat_gtag_UA_90022463_5 | 0 | 1 minute | Google uses this cookie to distinguish users. |
_gid | 0 | 1 day | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form. |
2 Comments
[…] The success of CTS Eventim consists of more than selling many tickets and hosting live events. This is because the close ties between the two business segments and the acquisition of competing ticket sellers and concert organizers have created a quasi-monopoly in Europe, including high market entry barriers. Thus, until the Federal Cartel Office intervened (see below on risks), CTS Eventim enforced against other promoters who wanted to use the CTS Eventim ticket system that they had to sell all tickets exclusively via the CTS Eventim ticketing system. This ensured that other ticket sellers either bled out financially or were unable to gain skin in the market. Besides, close partnerships exist between event organizers and ticket vendors in the ticket business. Therefore, a new competitor in the ticket market would have difficulties obtaining ticket contingents for popular events. Today many organizers are either owned by CTS Eventim or tied to the company with exclusive top level connections. CTS Eventim has thus become a platform that benefits from the same network effects as Facebook. […]
[…] a possible spin-off, Alphabet is exposed to the same threats as Amazon and Facebook, whose chairmen had to face a hearing in the US Congress on potential market abuse in different […]